<h2><u>the</u><u> </u><u>function</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>sos</u><u> </u><u>are</u><u>:</u></h2><h2><u>1</u><u>.</u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>help</u><u> </u><u>peop</u><u>le</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>their</u><u> </u><u>need</u><u>.</u></h2><h2><u>2</u><u>.</u><u>To</u><u> </u><u>save</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>life</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>people</u><u>.</u></h2>
<u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u>
If I had written your question in English, I could have helped you
Answer:
American political culture has imbued it with more tolerance and greater respect for orderly procedures and personal rights than can be found in nations with constitutions like ours. Americans are willing to let whoever wins an election govern without putting up a fuss, and the U.S. military does not intervene.
The problem with giving plastic power in the hands of a representative body is that through it you can give basically a wide range of possible abilities/power which they can exert as they please. This isn't the best idea to do when the current representative body is prone to corruption for example.
Its either B or D. Omg I forgot