Answer:
hope that may help you
Explanation:
Jus in bello = justice during war - describes conduct that is just / morally permissible with in war.
The Just War theory specifies conditions for judging if it is just to go to war, and conditions for how the war should be fought. Although it was extensively developed by Christian theologians, it can be used by people of every faith and none.
Some English settlers had to fight for the land because some American Indians already had the land and the English settlers really wanted it so they fought for the land which led to wars
I encountered this question before but it had choices. The missing choices of this question are:
A- immigration
<span>B-Natural selection </span>
<span>C- Random mutations </span>
<span>D- Geographic isolation
My answer would be C - RANDOM MUTATIONS.
A. Immigration is not applicable because it states There has been no migration in or out of the population in the last 200 years.
B. Natural selection is not applicable because of it states that the recessive allele frequency has been 0%.
D. Geographic isolation is not applicable because it is not a factor in the increase in the recessive allele frequency.
</span>
A weakness of the sociological approach is that findings from studies cannot be generalized or extrapolated to the wider population. Sociological approaches often involve studies on certain types of groups that do not represent an entire population. For instance if you conduct a study on the effects of media on political views, and the sample you use are only university students, the findings are not representative of non-university students.
Answer:
<em><u>Similarities and difference between the indigenous people of Australia and New Zealand</u></em>
There exist only a few similarities between the Aborigines of Australia and the Maori of New Zealand. Both of these groups were first on their respective lands and both their lands were taken over by the Europeans a few hundred years ago. They both suffered from extreme poverty due to the west and the Europeans' financial status was always better than theirs.
Looking at it from a cultural point of view, The Maori and the Aboriginals come from two completely unrelated backgrounds. Also, while the Aborigines had inhabited their native Australia for thousands and thousands of years before they were conquered by the Europeans, the Maori had lived in their lands for only about 800 years. There were always fights and conflicts between the British and the Maori while the Aborigines were treated far worse by the British, depriving them of all their basic rights.
