Answer:
d. pollution should be eliminated as long as the benefit from a cleanup exceeds the opportunity cost.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is defined as the forgone cost of doing a particular activity. If you were not undertaking this activity what would you have gained by doing something else?
In this case as long as the benefit from cleaning up the pollution is greater than the opportunity cost (pollution) it should be undertaken.
Answer: D. I, II, and III
Explanation:
If expecting a price deduction, you can buy Put options. These give you the right to sell an underlying stock at a certain price regardless of what the price in the market is. If you purchased this, you can sell your stock above market value if it does go down.
You can sell write call options for a fee where you give the buyer the right to buy your shares at a certain price in future. This is only valuable if prices rise so as you are expecting prices to fall, you could make a premium on the call option contract fees if prices fall without having to sell off your shares.
Hedging with puts is better than short calls if you are expecting a major stock price decline as the opportunity for profit is higher.
Answer:
$34,500
Explanation:
Calculation to determine total revenues for the year
Using this formula
Total revenues=Increase in Assets+Decreased in liabilities+Dividends+Expenses
Let plug in the formula
Total revenues=($11,000-$19,000)+($9,000-$7,500)+$4,000+$21,000
Total revenues=$8,000+$1,500+$4,000+$21,000
Total revenues=$34,500
Therefore total revenues for the year is $34,500
Answer:
$4,267,059
Explanation:
to determine the equivalent amount of money between 1924 and 2008, we must divide the 2008 CPI by the 1924 CPI, and then multiply by $36,000:
= (2015 / 17) x $36,000 = 118.53 x $36,000 = $4,267,059
The consumer price index measures the weighted price of basket of goods . It is useful for calculating inflation and comparing how the purchasing value of the US dollar has decreased in time. Basically what this shows us, is that $1 in 1924 would purchase the same amount of goods as $118.53 in 2008.
Answer:
Dana
Explanation:
According to my research on different bank responsibilities, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the bank is completely liable to Dana. This is because the bank has a responsibility to Dana since she is the one who signed to open the account, which in term is her. They must now let her know why they dishonored the check and provide a solution.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.