Answer:
Solomon is most likely going to believe that his twenty workers are not autonomous anymore, and certainly exploit them.
Explanation:
David Kipnis proposes that power over other people gives the subject with power the impression that other do not control their own behavior and that they are not autonomous anymore.
Also, that a person who successfully exercises power over others is most likely to believe that they are less deserving of respect, thus they become a target of exploiting.
In this case Solomon has legitimate authority and has the absolute power over his workers behaviors so it is most likely that Solomon exercises his power by evading his workers autonomy and exploiting them.
Generally, the best way to proceed when you have concerns about the behavior of a colleague is to deal directly with the colleague, unless doing so would compromise a client's confidentiality.
If they continue doing such behavior, we can make it known to those in charge of company ethics. We can provide the evidence of the violations.
If we are unsure whether their behavior is unethical or not, it is better that we may consult with people who are charged with maintenance of ethical standard the concerns you have.
Also direct complain would not help because we may might have misinterpreted the actions of the colleague. So it is better to watch out and deal directly.
To learn more about behavior here
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. applied the Second Amendment to state governments.
Explanation:
The second amendment was applied by the Supreme Court holding that it was incorporated under the fourteenth amendment as regards the Due Process Clause or Privileges or Immunities Clause , and reversing the Seventh Circuit in this way. This decision by the Supreme Court in June 2010 cleared the uncertainty in the Chicago gun restrictions as well as in other states.
