Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You need 2 things in order to solve this equation: a trig identity sheet and a unit circle.
You will find when you look on your trig identity sheet that
so we will make that replacement, getting everything in terms of sin:
Now we will get everything on one side of the equals sign, set it equal to 0, and solve it:
We can factor out the sin(theta), since it's common in both terms:
Because of the Zero Product Property, either
or
Look at the unit circle and find which values of theta have a sin ratio of 0 in the interval from 0 to 2pi. They are:
The next equation needs to first be solved for sin(theta):
so
and
Go back to your unit circle and find the values of theta where the sin is -1/2 in the interval. They are:
Answer:
A) x>8
B) x<4
Step-by-step explanation:
A) 3x+5>29
3x>24
x>8 (It's greater than because the angle opposite is greater than the other angle)
B) 6x-17<7
6x<24
x<4 (It's less than because the angle opposite is smaller than the other angle)
Answer: a thunderstorm
Step-by-step explanation:
B/c there is more than one way to do math but if you don’t do it a specific way at a certain time then it becomes a problem.
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
2) Solution to the problem
On this case we want to test is 
and the system of hypothesi on this case are:
Null Hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis:
On this case is our decision is FAILS to reject the null hypothesis then we can conclude that we don't have enough evidence to support the claim at the significance level provided. So the correct conclusion would be:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
I think your answer is WX. The pattern from what I can tell is: ab CD efg HI jkl MN opq RS tuv WX yz.
