All categories

4 years ago

X^2+y^2=y in polar form

1 answer:

5 0

Replace x^2+y^2 with r^2. Also replace y with r*sin theta.

Then we have r^2 = r*sin theta.

this can be reduced to r = sin theta.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP!!!

Aliun [14]

Answer:

a. 8.75 M NaOH

b. 0.425 M CuCl₂ or 0.43 M CuCl₂

c. 0.067 M CaCO₃ or 0.07 M CaCO₃

Step-by-step explanation:

Molality is computed using the formula:

$M = \dfrac{Moles\:of\:solute}{Liters\:of\:solution}$

So first thing you need to do is determine how many moles of solute there are and divide it by the solution in liters.

Converting mass to moles, you need to get the mass of each solute per mole. You can use the periodic table to get the atomic mass (which is the grams per mole of each atom) of each of the elements involved. Then add them up and you will have how many grams per mole of each compound.

1. 35.0g of NaOH in 100ml H₂O

Element number of atoms atomic mass TOTAL

Na 1 x 22.99g/mol = 22.99g/mol

O 1 x 16.00g/mol = 16.00g/mol

H 1 x 1.01g/mol = 1.01g/mol

40.00g/mol

This means that the molecular mass of NaOH is 40.00 g/mol

Then we use this to convert 35.0g of NaOH to moles:

$35.0g \:of\:NaOH \times \dfrac{1\:mole\:of\:NaOH}{40.00g\:of\:NaOH} = \dfrac{35.0\:moles\:of\:NaOH}{40.00}=0.875\:moles\:of\:NaOH$

Now that you have the number of moles we divide it by the solution in liters. Before we can do that you have to conver 100ml to L.

$100ml\times\dfrac{1L}{1000ml} = 0.1 L$

Then we divide it:

$\dfrac{0.875\:moles\:of\:NaOH}{0.1L of solution} = 8.75M\: NaOH$

2. 20.0g CuCl₂ in 350ml H₂O

Element number of atoms atomic mass TOTAL

Cu 1 x 63.55g/mol = 63.55g/mol

Cl 2 x 34.45g/mol = 70.90g/mol

134.45g/mol

$20.g\:of\:CuCl_2\times\dfrac{1\:mole\:of\:CuCl_2}{134.45\:g\:of\:CuCl_2}=0.1488\:moles\:of\:CuCl_2$

350ml = 0.350L

$\dfrac{0.1488\:moles\:of\:CuCl_2}{0.350L\:of\:solution}=0.425M\:CuCl_2$

3. 3.35g CaCO₃ in 500ml

Element number of atoms atomic mass TOTAL

Ca 1 x 40.08g/mol = 40.08g/mol

C 1 x 12.01g/mol = 12.01g/mol

O 3 x 16.00g/mol = 48.00g/mol

100.09g/mol

$3.35g\:of\:CaCO_3\times\dfrac{1\:mole\:of\:CaCO_3}{100.09\:g\:of\:CaCO_3}=0.0335\:moles\:of\:CaCO_3$

500ml = 0.5L

$\dfrac{0.0335\:moles\:of\:CaCO_3}{0.5L}=0.067M\:CaCo_3$

4 0

3 years ago

What is the value of f(3)?

Anni [7]

Answer:

-12

Step-by-step explanation:

Note that when x < 6, you will use the expression -4x

f(x) = -4x

Plug in 3 for x

f(3) = -4(3)

Simplify. Multiply

f(3) = -4(3)

f(3) = -12

-12 is your answer

5 0

3 years ago

The interior angles of a triangle have measures (2x - 5), (4– 1), and 30°

const2013 [10]

Answer: x=26

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Write the equation 2x-5+4x-1+30=180 because all triangle angles add up to 180°

2. Simplify the equation by combining like terms. Write the equation as 6x+24=180

3. Subtract 24 from both sides. Write the equation as 6x=156.

4. Divide 156/6 and get 26. That is your answer (x=26).

8 0

3 years ago

Miss Fallon wants to paint her classroom door in a checkerboard pattern. The door measures 96 inches in length and 36 inches in

algol13

Answer:The door mesures 96 inches in length and 36 inches in width

if u need a explenation you can ask me

4 0

3 years ago

-4x - 6y = 6 4x + 6y = -4

Sloan [31]

Step-by-step explanation:

$-4x - 6y = 6$

$4x + 6y = -4$

To solve a system of equations, we can add the two equations and solve for one of the remaining variables -- let's try to eliminate the $x$ variable when we add the two equations together.

Right now, there's a $-4x$ term in the first equation, and a $4x$ term in the second equation, so if we add those together, we'll be able to eliminate the $x$ variable altogether and solve for $y$ .

However, when we also have a $-6y$ term in the first equation and $6y$ term in the second equation, so adding these together will also eliminate the $y$ term, leaving a $0$ on the left-hand side of the equation.

If we add the two numbers on the right side of the equation, we get $-2$ , which does not equal $0$ , meaning there are no solutions to this system of equations.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers