Answer:
The equation that represents this situation is 2c² - 5c - 322 = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
∵ Kenan has c clients
∵ Jeff has five less than twice the number of clients that
Kenan has
- That means multiply c by 2 and then subtract 5 from the
product to find the number of Jeff's clients
∴ Jeff's clients = 2c - 5
∵ The product of the number of clients they have is 322
∴ c × (2c - 5) = 322
- Multiply c by the bracket (2c - 5)
∴ (c)(2c) + (c)(-5) = 322
∴ 2c² + (-5c) = 322
- Remember (+)(-) = (-)
∴ 2c² - 5c = 322
- Subtract 322 from both sides
∴ 2c² - 5c - 322 = 0
The equation that represents this situation is 2c² - 5c - 322 = 0
The value of dividing x^2-3x+9 by x-2 is x + 3
<h3>Ways of dividing polynomials</h3>
There are several ways to divide polynomial functions; some of these ways include
- By factorization
- By long division
- By synthetic division
- By using technology such as graph
<h3>How to divide the polynomials?</h3>
The expression for the polynomial division is given as:
x^2-3x+9/x-2
To divide polynomial functions, we make use of the division by factorization method
Start by expanding the numerator of the polynomial division
x^2-3x+9/x-2 = x^2 + 3x - 6x + 9/x-2
Factorize the equation
x^2-3x+9/x-2 = x(x + 3) - 2(x + 3)/x - 2
Factor out x + 3 from the numerator
x^2-3x+9/x-2 = (x- 2)(x + 3)/x - 2
Cancel out the common factors
x^2-3x+9/x-2 = x + 3
Hence, the value of dividing x^2-3x+9 by x-2 is x + 3
Read more about polynomial division at:
brainly.com/question/25289437
#SPJ1
Answer:
Subsets That Make Up the Real Numbers. The set of real numbers is made up of the rational and the irrational numbers. Rational numbers are integers and numbers that can be expressed as a fraction.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Note*
To evaluate an expression, we substitute the given number for the variable in the expression and then simplify the expression using the order of operations. To evaluate, substitute 3 for x in the expression, and then simplify.
Answer:
1. Yes (side angle side)
2. I don’t know for sure but I’m thinking no
3. No
Step-by-step explanation: