Determine the value of w and x in the figure below. (Thanks for the help I really appreciate it!)
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 25
The mean is
The standard deviation is
The z-score is z = -1.94
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
Generally the p-value is mathematically evaluated as
From the z table the area under the normal curve to the left corresponding to -1.94 is
=>
=>
Let assume the level of significance is
Hence the this mean that
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Answer:
g(x)<j(x)<k(x)<f(x)<m(x)<h(x)
Step-by-step explanation:
1.
The denominator of f is defined for all real values of x
Therefore, the function is continuous on the set of real numbers
3.
It cannot be factorize .
Therefore, it has no real values for which it is not defined .
Hence, function h is defined for all real values.
2.
The denominator of g is defined for all real values of x.
Therefore, the function g is continuous on the set of real numbers
4.
x-9=0
x=9
The function i is not defined for x=9
Therefore, the function i is not continuous on the set of real numbers.
5.
The denominator of j is defined for all real values of x.
Therefore, the function j is continuous on the set of real numbers.
6.
It cannot be factorize .
Therefore, it has no real values for which it is not defined .
Hence, function k is defined for all real values.
7.
The function is not defined for x=8 and x=1
Hence, function l is not defined for all real values.
8.
The denominator of m is defined for all real values of x.
Therefore, the function m is continuous on the set of real numbers.
g(x)<j(x)<k(x)<f(x)<m(x)<h(x)