<u>Answer:
</u>
The question is demanding from the respondent to use the concept of symbolic interactionism to explain the difference that is evident between norms that are followed in different settings.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The norms that are followed by people in day to day life change according to the setting that the people live in. These norms are based on cultural beliefs, traditions, the social build-up of the society, etc.
- Most common norms followed by the people in different settings are associated with routine living. These norms are generally applicable to all the elements of society.
Doctors
Engineers
Teachers
Scientists
Social Workers
Answer:
The encounter of the Native American with Cabeza de vaca, Coronado La salle or a catholic missionary would provoke strangeness and even fear. Because of the aesthetic difference between these individuals and the lack of knowledge of the Indian. Abaio follows a paragraph on how an American Indian would describe this encounter to another American Indian.
Explanation:
Suddenly I was able to see a man approaching, it was strange colored, it presented different skins and elements to the necks I saw before. I ran into the forest to hide, because I looked like a man, but I didn't know if it was dangerous. This man seems to have come from a very distant tribe and outside the standards we know, besides, he spoke things that I couldn't understand, it seemed more that he was just making sounds to his fellow men, as animals do.
Answer: the major piece of advice from my texbook that Heather needs to be reminded is that "there is no such thing as a perfect speech".
Explanation:
Since we are human beings and it's within our nature to commit mistakes and audiences tend to praise what they like to listen and not the truth, we could say that speeches can be good but not perfect.
