Answer:
People tend to make systematic and predictable mistakes in their thinking. These mistakes are called biases.
Explanation:
Humans are not perfect decision makers. Everyday humans make numerous decisions and try their best to be rational. But many times, our cognitive limitations prevent us from doing so. In systematic and predictable ways, we do drift away from perfection. Even if we take each step properly to make a decision by first defining the problem, then thinking of alternatives for the solution and then take a decision, one is bound to get affected by cognitive thinking. Such mistakes that humans make are called biases. They affect the judgement of even a very talented human being.
Answer:
Current events
Explanation:
In a situation such as this, the group is more interested to talk about other subjects than the experiences to raise their children. Because of that, in order to create a discussion, to receive good feedback and, most importantly, to maintain the discussion, John should be talking about the current events that are happening around them. By current events I mean ordinary situations or something that is influential, not only in his life but on the lives of everyone.
I don't think so probably not but maybe.. just maybe :l
C. The president
the president is the constitutional head executive of the state
Answer:
Above Passage does commit a fallacy; specifically, it does commit an appeal to pity fallacy.
Explanation:
The fallacy usually referred to as an appeal to pity refers to the inclination to establish premises that appeal to psychological motivation to get someone to accept a conclusion, distracting the listener from the irrelevance of the premises provided. Mostly, the appeal to pity fallacy tries to convince someone of accepting a conclusion by appealing to something that could provoke pity from the listener, and not to an objective evaluation of the evidence.
In this example, the speaker is trying to make the listener feel guilty for receiving a bonus, appealing to the idea of others struggling with money as a valid reason for such an argument. The idea of others feeling bad about the bonus is not enough reason for the listener to refuse it, but the feeling of guilt could be enough for him to feel forced to do it.
