All categories

3 years ago

Which of these triangle pairs can be mapped to each other using a translation and a rotation about point A?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

its d on e2020

Step-by-step explanation:

Vladimir79 [104]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Figure A

Step-by-step explanation:

See the attached figure which represents the given options

We are to select the correct pair of triangles that can be mapped to each other using a translation and a rotation about point A.

As shown: point A will map to point L, point R will map to point P and point Q will map to point K.

we will check the options:

Figure A: the triangle ARQ and LPK can be mapped to each other using a translation and a rotation about point A.

Figure B: the triangle ARQ and LPK can be mapped to each other using a translation and a reflection about the line RA.

Figure C: the triangle ARQ and LPK can be mapped to each other using a translation and a reflection about the line QA.

Figure D: the triangle ARQ and LPK can be mapped to each other using a rotation about point A.

So, the answer is figure A

The triangle pairs of figure A can be mapped to each other using a translation and a rotation about point A.

You might be interested in

Here is the question here please answer

earnstyle [38]

Daaaaaaaaaammmmm that’s hard

4 0

3 years ago

Can u help me with this

erica [24]

The last one because it can be traced like Jerome gets these cards from this place but others from a different place

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Each side of a professional baseball base must measure 15inches what is the base side length in feet

Lyrx [107]

1-1/4 feet is the base side length.

6 0

3 years ago

Help? I can't seem to understand arithmegic sequence.

katrin2010 [14]

A sequence $\{a_n\}$ is arithmetic if the difference between consecutive terms is some fixed number, regardless of which pair of consecutive terms you pick out of the sequence.

For example, the following sequences are arithmetic:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... (difference = 1)

-25, -20, -15, -10, -5, ... (difference = 5)

2. Carla's sequence is not arithmetic, because the differences between consecutive terms are all different:

13 - 11 = 2

17 - 13 = 4

25 - 17 = 8

She can adjust the sequence by changing the last two numbers to 15 and 17, since this makes the difference fixed:

13 - 11 = 2

15 - 13 = 2

17 - 15 = 2

and so on.

3. The sequence

45, 48, 51, 54, ...

is arithmetic with difference 3 between terms. Recursively, we can write the $n$ th term, $a_n$ , in terms of the previous, $(n-1)$ th term, $a_{n-1}$ :

$a_n=a_{n-1}+3$

By this definition, we can just as easily write the $(n-1)$ th term in terms of the $(n-2)$ th term:

$a_{n-1}=a_{n-2}+3$

Then, substituting this into the previous equation, we have

$a_n=(a_{n-2}+3)+3=a_{n-2}+2\cdot3$

We can continue this process to write $a_n$ in terms of $a_1$ :

$a_{n-2}=a_{n-3}+3\implies a_n=a_{n-3}+3\cdot3$

$a_{n-3}=a_{n-4}+3\implies a_n=a_{n-4}+4\cdot3$

and so on. (You might notice that the subscript of the term on the right side, and the number of 3s being added, together sum to $n$ .) The pattern continues down to

$a_n=a_1+(n-1)\cdot3$