<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that in general expansion was not justifiable since the Mexicans and Natives were doing nothing to provoke the US. One could argue it was justifiable since Americans needed more land. </span>
United States participation in the ICC treaty regime would also be unconstitutional because it would allow the trial of U.S. citizens for crimes committed on U.S. soil, which are otherwise entirely within the judicial power of the United States.
If their rights were being infringed upon, saw rules/laws as unjust or unfair
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The search for spices leads to global exploration as the Europeans moved to Asia in search of spices.
During this period ( 15th century), the Europeans pass through the silky roads, and later they planned in avoiding the Arabs merchants who profit as middlemen and pirates.
Consequently, the Europeans tried moving through water which made them get more access to North Africa, Middle East, and Asia.
Later, in the attempt of getting to Asia faster, the Europeans moved westward, and instead of getting to India in Asia, got landed on the present-day American continent.
Hence, the search for spice leads to global exploration.
