Answer:
I would have to say invalid.
Explanation:
There is not enough information to have a fully valid argument.
Answer:
1. I broke my promise of buying my younger one an Ice-cream when she recovered from her illness. I rather bought her a toy.
2. I lied about not knowing the whereabouts of a man who was to be punished for belonging to a particular religion.
Explanation:
1. The moral theory of utilitarianism will justify the first scenario. This theory states that an action or policy is right if it maximizes happiness or results in the greater good of society. The action I took in the first case resulted in the greater good of my sister because a cup of ice cream would not be healthy for her who was just recovering from an illness. Therefore, that decision was for her greater good.
2. The Deontology theory that states that having a morally justifiable intent is better than obtaining the right results will justify my action. For me, it was not morally right that a man should be punished for his religion and that superseded telling the truth about the man's whereabouts.
Depends on the person but most times, yes, that is true.
The answer is: Herbert Spencer
He is known as the one that coined the phrase 'Survival of the fittest'. He believed that our environment will currently changing as time progress.That changes will force people in societies to adapt and change their behavior in order to survive in the new condition.
In modern time phenomenon we, One example that we can use is the development of social media. In the past, marketing and political campaigns relied heavily on television and door to door interaction. Social media changes that. The only corporations and politicians that can survive are the one that willing to implement social media into their strategies.
Answer:
Death
Explanation:
It's only fair that he has/would kill people, we should do it to him
