Answer:
So long as their laws do not contradict national laws, state governments can prescribe policies on commerce, taxation, healthcare, education, and many other issues within their state. Notably, both the states and the federal government have the power to tax, make and enforce laws, charter banks, and borrow money.
Explanation:
The correct answer is <span>B. Smith would be the plaintiff and Henderson will be the defendant.
Smith would be the plaintiff because that's the name for the person who is initiating the lawsuit in a civil case. Prosecution is when the country does it in a criminal court. Henderson would be the defendant and would have to provide a preponderance of evidence that Smith is incorrect.</span>
Answer:
Talmadge argued FDR's New Deal programs were infringing on the rights of the states
Explanation:<em> A staunch Georgian Democrat, he believed in white superiority and the rules of the Jim Crow south. Programs like the WPA and the CCC allowed for black workers and in the South this was unacceptable and refuted their current social structure. Talmadge believed that the states should have the right to choose the workers for the programs implemented in their states. </em>
<em />
Sarcastic Gamer is the answer
The legal basis for this prohibition is because they are trying to end segregation as it was added to the billof rights. The federal laws are the ones who handle this type of issues as well as employment, housing,lending, public accommodations, and most importantly law enforcements.
