Answer:
A. definition
Explanation:
A definition is a simple statement that describes or explains a point or information. Here, it has been stated that you need to make sure that the audience has the appropriate information which is necessary to understand the body of your speech. Hence, you must be including a definition at the beginning of the speech or presentation or in the introduction for the audience.
I believe the answer is: resource room
in School setting, resource room refers to a room separated from classess that is used solely for the purpose of remeditation for students who fail to meet a certain standard in regular class. usually, students would be given homeworks or other assignments as a chance to fix their score.
Answer:
If Presidents were elected for life, we would not be the same. Everything would not change and we wouldn't get a chance to see something new. If its a bad president, bad things will keep happening. But, f it's a good president, good things will happen.
Explanation:
The passage of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 resulted in the second battle of Seminole Wars (1835-1842).
The Seminole Wars were three conflicts based in Florida between the Seminole Tribe and the United States Army. The conflict was based on Seminoles fighting back against the forcible removal of Native Americans to federal reservations. The Seminoles, who were outnumbered, used guerilla “hit and run” war tactics that are still studied today.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.