1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksandrvk [35]
3 years ago
5

Suppose a random sample of 100 observations from a binomial population gives a value of pˆ = .63 and you wish to test the null h

ypothesis that the population parameter p is equal to .70 against the alternative hypothesis that p is less than .70.
a) nothing that p = .63, what does your intuition tell you? does the value of p appear to contradict the null hypothesis?
b) use the large-sample z-test to test H0: p = .70 against the alternative hypothesis, Ha: p < 70. Use a = .05. How do the test results compare with your intuitive decision from part A?
c) find and interpret the observed significance level of the test you conducted in part B.
Mathematics
1 answer:
irakobra [83]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

We conclude that the population proportion is equal to 0.70.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a random sample of 100 observations from a binomial population gives a value of pˆ = 0.63 and you wish to test the null hypothesis that the population parameter p is equal to 0.70 against the alternative hypothesis that p is less than 0.70.

Let p = <u><em>population proportion.</em></u>

(1) The intuition tells us that the population parameter p may be less than 0.70 as the sample proportion comes out to be less than 0.70 and also the sample is large enough.

(2) So, Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p = 0.70      {means that the population proportion is equal to 0.70}

Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p < 0.70      {means that the population proportion is less than 0.70}

The test statistics that would be used here <u>One-sample z-test</u> for proportions;

                           T.S. =  \frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } }  ~  N(0,1)

where, \hat p = sample proportion = 0.63

            n = sample of observations = 100

So, <u><em>the test statistics</em></u>  =  \frac{0.63-0.70}{\sqrt{\frac{0.70(1-0.70)}{100} } }

                                     =  -1.528

The value of z-test statistics is -1.528.

<u>Now at 0.05 level of significance, the z table gives a critical value of -1.645 for the left-tailed test.</u>

Since our test statistics is more than the critical value of z as -1.528 > -1.645, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which <u><em>we fail to reject our null hypothesis</em></u>.

Therefore, we conclude that the population proportion is equal to 0.70.

(c) The observed level of significance in part B is 0.05 on the basis of which we find our critical value of z.

You might be interested in
$15 lunch 20% tip to the nearest cent
Crank
It would be exactly $3.00
5 0
3 years ago
Riemann Hypothesis: Explain how to answer it ( hardest math problem in the world)
bija089 [108]

Answer:

Addicts the remote hypothesis is a conjecture that the remote data function has it zeroes only at the negative even integers in complex numbers with real part half many considered to be the most important unsolved problem in pure mathematics is of great interest in number theory because it implies results about the distribution of prime numbers

5 0
3 years ago
Answer this question if you wanna be my guy best friend
Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

b. 0.50x+15=25

so the answer is 20

7 0
3 years ago
2 1/4 - 2/3. A. 1 3/7. B. 1 7/12. C 2 3/7. D 2 11/12
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

B.) 1\frac{7}{12}

Step-by-step explanation:

2\frac{1}{4} -\frac{2}{3} Then multiply 4 by 2, then add 1.frac{9}{4} - \frac{2}{3} \\

Then find the Least Common Denominator(LCD); simply just multiply 4 by 3 to get 12; then multiply using the opposite number.

\frac{3}{3} *\frac{9}{4} - \frac{4}{4} * \frac{2}{3}

to get: \frac{27}{12} - \frac{8}{12}.

now the denominators is the same on both sides, just subtract the numerator.

27 - 8 = 19

Now simply: \frac{19}{12} = 1\frac{7}{12}.

Your final answer is 1\frac{7}{12}[/tex].

3 0
3 years ago
Solve the following inequality for w then simplify <br> -w+9&gt;6w+8
Alla [95]

Answer:

\displaystyle (-\infty,\frac{1}{7})

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Inequalities</u>

To solve the inequality:

-w+9>6w+8

We need to perform the required operations on both sides of the inequality to have the variable w isolated.

First, we subtract 9:

-w+9>6w+8

-w>6w+8-9

Subtracting 6w:

-w-6w>+8-9

Operating:

-7w>-1

Now we divide by -7 but recall that when dividing by a negative number, we must flip the inequality sign:

\displaystyle w

Operating:

\displaystyle w

Solution:

\mathbf{\displaystyle (-\infty,\frac{1}{7})}

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Andrew earned $125.00 last year on his investment of $10,000.00
    13·2 answers
  • Here are the grades ! Help me please
    7·1 answer
  • What is p(x)=12x-600
    8·1 answer
  • Solve the triangle. Round your answers to the nearest tenth.
    13·1 answer
  • What is the area of the figure?
    10·1 answer
  • (BRAINLIEST AND 15 POINTS. SHOW ALL WORK) A cheetah runs at an average speed of 15 m/s in 24 seconds. What distance does the che
    12·2 answers
  • 3x – 19 = 24.5<br> Your answer
    8·1 answer
  • I need help solving this practice question​
    6·1 answer
  • ..................................<br><br>......
    6·1 answer
  • What is the solution to the system of equations below?<br><br> x + y = 7 and x + 2 y = 11
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!