Answer:
I believe that the term would be a region. I hope this helps you! :)
Answer: One significant distinction among Kush and Egypt is their areas. Kush was a domain toward the south of Egypt and was worked at the base of the mountains. They had a consistent measure of precipitation. This precipitation combined with the spillover from the mountains implied that they quite often had fruitful soil. This was an alternate story for Egypt. Egypt relied upon the yearly flooding of the Nile River so as to have great soil to plant and develop food required for endurance. This flooding was indispensable to their progress. Another contrast among Kush and Egypt is that sovereigns governed Kush, not at all like the male lords and pharaohs that controlled Egypt. They additionally fabricated burial chambers like the Egyptians did however the Kush by and large constructed burial chambers with level rooftops on them. Kush likewise had regular assets, for example, gold, ivory, and iron metal. Preservation is likewise a region where they had a few contrasts. The cycle of embalmment in Egypt was frequently held for those with abundance on the grounds that the cycle was costly and the average citizens couldn't manage the cost of it. Kush aristocrats likewise embalmed their dead however the ordinary citizens preserved their dead also.
Explanation:
<span>Monetary payment made by one ex-spouse to the other after a divorce is known as alimony.
</span>It is a legal obligation for financial support one spouse has to provide <span> to the other during and/or after a legal separation.
</span>Alimony is awarded by the court.
<span>The purpose of the alimony is to limit any unfair economic effects of a divorce.</span>
He hated them and sent them out
