Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
i dont know
Step-by-step explanation:
Add all of the numbers together
7 + 9 + 0 + (-9) + (-7)
simplify it down to:
(7+9+0)= 16
-9 + (-7)= - 16
So, -16 + 16 = 0
then divide 0 by 5 to get the answer of 0
To find the mean you have to add all of the numbers together and then divide by the amount of numbers that you have.
Carlos is correct
Since we don't know the length of sides PR and XZ, the triangles can't be congruent by the SSS theorem or the SAS theorem, and since we don't know the measure of angles Y and Q, the triangles can't be congruent by the ASA theorem, the SAS theorem or the AAS theorem. Therefore, Carlos is correct.
Carlos is correct. Since the angles P and X are not included between PQ and RQ and XY and YZ, the SAS postulate cannot be used, since it states that the angle must be included between the sides. Unlike with ASA, where there is the AAS theorem for non-included sides, there is not SSA theorem for non-included angles, so the triangles cannot be proven to be congruent.
If he won 40, then he lost 112-40 or 72 games.
Ratio= lost/win
Ratio=72/40
72/40
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
x > 0; $1280
Step-by-step explanation:
Domain should be x > 0 because length is not negative
When x = 8
Cost = 20(8²) = 1280