Although a description of the case was not provided for this question, we can confirm that as a member of the jury, when deciding guilt, you should hold the prosecution to the burden of proof.
<h3>What we know about the burden of proof.</h3>
- In any criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof.
- The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
- When acting as a member of the jury, you should hold your decision to this standard.
- You should only vote guilty if there are no logical doubts present as to the arguments presented by the prosecution.
Therefore, we can confirm that when acting as a jury member, you should base your decision on the prosecution's ability to prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.
To learn more about criminal law visit:
brainly.com/question/1869780?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Your answer would be B; "they signed the contract with the first dealer and now must take the original deal."
Explanation:
They already signed the contract with the first dealer and now the only option available to them is to take the original deal since they have already signed the contract meaning they have legal duty to that first dealer. (Legal Duty: a legally binding obligation on a contract to follow the law when doing something towards the other part. Since they have signed it is legally binding that they now take the original deal or the first deal.)
Answer:
ill as anwser if your still there
Answer:
B. Office
Explanation:
A judge's chambers is his office which is often attached by an adjoining door to his courtroom. The modern chambers of a trial judge, however, lacks the bookcases filled with thick legal books--they are no longer needed in light of computer research programs such as Westlaw or Lexis.
