Here are a bunch of CORRECT answers. Your answer is in the first pic. I got number 3 wrong, but it still showed the correct answer.
Answer:
246.76$
Step-by-step explanation:
199 x .24 =
47.76
199 + 47.76 =
246.76
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
It takes 534.54 watts
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :
Mass of the book = 30kg
Distance = 10m
Time = 5.5 sec
To Find:
How much power did it take = ?
Solution:
Step 1: calculate the work done
Work done = 
where
m = mass
a = acceleration due to gravity
d = distance
Substituting the values,
Work done = 
=> 2940 Nm
Step 2: calculate the Power
We know that
Substituting the values,
Power = 534.54 watts
