Answer:
Overbreadth Doctrine
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the resolution was unconstitutional under the First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine. This doctrine protects against prohibiting behavior that is guaranteed by the constitution, such as freedom of speech. The airport making a "First Amendment-Free Zone" was unconstitutional under this doctrine.
Answer:
Private parties can negotiate to an efficient solution in the presence of externalities if the <u>transaction costs</u> is (are) relatively low.
<u>Potential way to internalise externality </u>: Including negative externality price in party tickets & using it for - better sound development , compensating residents for a negative effect to them
Explanation:
Coase Theorem states that two parties can bargain & reach at a socially efficient outcome, internalising negative externality impact - if the transaction cost is low.
Eg : A neighbouring farm & ranch, where Ranch's cattle wander & destroy farm's crops. It would be efficient to solution to draw a fence around the farm, contributed by the rancher also
In this case : Noise negative externality can be internalised by :
- Including the externality valuation as increased price in the party tickets
- Using the surplus collected money to internalise externality - for :
- Noise solving ways, eg headphones dj & sound proof venue development
- Compensating nearby locality for the adverse effect on them
The answer from the given choices is "campaign".
A campaign refers to an arranged arrangement of exercises that individuals complete over some undefined time frame with a specific end goal to accomplish something, for example, social or political change.If somebody battles for something, they do an arranged arrangement of exercises over some undefined time frame so as to accomplish their point.