1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
4 years ago
11

A student answers a multiple-choice examination question that offers four possible answers. Suppose the probability that the stu

dent knows the answer to the question is 0.8 and the probability that the student will guess is 0.2. Assume that if the student guesses, the probability of selecting the correct answer is 0.25. If the student correctly answers a question, what is the probability that the student really knew the correct answer
Mathematics
1 answer:
Salsk061 [2.6K]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The value is P(A | W) =  0.941

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The probability that the student knows the answer to the question is P(A) =  0.8

The probability that that the student will guess is P(G) =  0.2

The probability that that the student get the correct answer given that the student guessed is P(W /G) =  0.25

Here W denotes that the student gets the correct answer

Generally it a certain fact that if the student knows the answer he would get it correctly

So the probability the the student got answer given that he knows it is

P(W | A) =  1

Generally from Bayes theorem we can mathematically evaluate the probability that the student knows the answer given that he got it correctly as follows

P(A | W) =  \frac{ P(A) *  P(W | A )}{ P(A) *  P(W | A) + P(G) * P(W| G)}

=> P(A | W) =  \frac{ 0.8 *  1}{ 0.8 *  1+ 0.2 * 0.25}

=> P(A | W) =  0.941

You might be interested in
What might have occured to cause the economy to be at point ×​
m_a_m_a [10]
Are you referring to a photo ?
7 0
3 years ago
Jk/j+k when j = 6 and k = 12
arlik [135]

Answer: I'm pretty sure it's 15

Step-by-step explanation:

18/6+12

3+12

15

3 0
3 years ago
Which is not generally used to represent a function?
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

C words

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Good Morning Ethansledd17!<br> what is 54873578x958498=?
pickupchik [31]

Answer: 5.259621477e13

Step-by-step explanation: Hoped this helped!!!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is meant by "bias due to selective survival" in cross-sectional studies? Under what circumstances might there be no selecti
Rudik [331]

Answer:

What is meant by "bias due to selective survival" in cross-sectional studies?

First lets understand what is selective bias in cross-sectional studies. Basically its the bias that occurs when the random sample data for some analysis is selected in improperly. Such a selected sample is not able to represent the population that is to be analyzed. The reason is the improper randomization. So "bias due to selective survival" means that only the survival participants or survivors can be considered in this cross sectional studies. So if there is more probability of exposed cases to survive than unexposed cases or it could also be possible that unexposed cases have more probability to survive than exposed ones, so in either case the conclusion drawn from this cross sectional studies may differ from the proper cohort study. So the selective bias is introduced. Hence we can say that there is bias due to selective survival.

Step-by-step explanation:

Under what circumstances might there be no selective survival bias even if the selection probabilities are not all equal?

If the cross product of selection probabilities equals 1. Then there might be no selective survival bias even if the selection probabilities are not all equal. As we know that the cross product of odd ratio of selection probabilities is 1 means there is no relation between exposure and consequence or outcome and there is no bias in odd ratio.

Suppose that you could assess that the direction of possible selective survival bias in your study was towards the null. If your study data yielded a non-statistically significant odds ratio of 1.04, would it be correct to conclude that there was no exposure-disease association in your source population?

It would not be correct to conclude that there was no exposure-disease association in your source population because if the possible selective survival bias in the study was towards the null then this implies that the true odds ratio would be larger than 1.04. and therefore likely to be large and also differ statistically for the null value.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Equivalent fractions using the LCD 7/10 and 2/5
    14·1 answer
  • The management of Ditton Industries has determined that the daily marginal revenue function associated with selling x units of t
    10·1 answer
  • The conservation club has 32 members. There are 18 girls in the club.
    14·2 answers
  • Which expression is equivalent to .02m(n - 5) - .02(m + 10)? A) .02mn - .12m - 0.2 B) .02mn + .12m - 0.2 C) .02mn - .12m + 0.2 D
    14·2 answers
  • Based on the given inequality statement, which statement correctly describes where the values are located on a number line relat
    14·1 answer
  • You lose one quarter, one dime, and two nickels what is the amount as a decimal
    14·2 answers
  • A quadratic function and an exponential function are graphed below. Which graph most likely represents the quadratic function?
    8·2 answers
  • Lori bought 6,000 grams of cayenne pepper and 2 kilograms of black pepper. How many grams of pepper did she buy all together?
    11·1 answer
  • Why must fungi obtain food from other organisms?
    15·1 answer
  • How many liters of 70% alcohol solution and 30% alcohol solution must be mixed to obtain 8 liters of 60% alcohol solution?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!