Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
9.65+0.4=10.05
16.058-1.2=14.858
Answer:
There is no question to answer. This is simply just a statement. If you need help, feel free to put the question under this comment because I don't understand what anyone is supposed to be answering from this "question."
Answer: point F is at <u> 0.6 </u> on the number line
=============================================================
Explanation:
The ratio 2:3 scales up to 2x:3x for some positive real number x.
This means the distance from D to F is 2x units, and the distance from F to E is 3x units. Combine those two smaller distances to get 2x+3x = 5x to represent the full distance from D to E.
D is at -3 and E is at 6. This is a distance of 9 units since |-3-6| = |-9| = 9
Set this equal to the 5x from earlier and solve
5x = 9
x = 9/5
x = 1.8
This leads to 2x = 2*1.8 = 3.6
Therefore, we'll move 3.6 units from -3 to -3+3.6 = 0.6 which is the location of point F on the number line.
Notice that from 0.6 to 6 is 5.4 units and that 3x = 3*1.8 = 5.4 matches up to help confirm the answer.
Answer:
the first one
Step-by-step explanation:
A graph showing the Earliest Start Times (EST) for project tasks is computed left to right based on the predecessor task durations. For dependent tasks, the earliest start time will be the latest of the finish times of predecessor tasks.
The first graph appears to appropriately represent the table values, using edges to represent task duration, and bubble numbers to represent start times.
The second graph does not appropriately account for duration of predecessor tasks.
The third graph seems to incorrectly compute task completion times (even if you assume that the edge/bubble number swap is acceptable).
I would love to help! What's the question?