Explanation:
I disagree with this argument, it can be said that the secondary market is equally or more important than the primary market, due to the fact that it is the secondary markets that determine what will be the prices that the companies that issue bonds will sell in the primary market.
Secondary markets can also be considered to be responsible for making securities easier to sell in the primary market due to their greater liquidity.
Answer:
Above the point bar
Explanation:
channelization
Straightened sections of the river channel are lined with concrete to increase the rate of flow and reduce bank collapse
Advantages of channelization
Improves rate of flow
Benefits transportation
Reduces bank collapse
Answer:
a) Bond rating is done by evaluating and considering all the relevant internal as well as external factors associated with the financial status of a business.
b) Bond rating helps in analysing the risk associated with the bond by analyzing its credit quality and thus helps investors taking decisions related to their investments.
Explanation:
a) Bond-rating is the letter grading system that is used to indicate the quality of the credit-related to the bond of various organizations. Bond-rating is done by evaluating and considering all the relevant internal as well as external factors associated with the financial status of a business. Internal factors may include the financial strength of the organization. External factors may include various networks with interested investors and other government organizations and policies related to the same.
There are three important agencies that analyze the credit quality of a bond. These agencies are Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch rating Inc.
b) Bond-rating help in analyzing the risk associated with the bond by analyzing its credit quality and thus helps investors taking decisions related to their investments. It helps the investors to study the stability and quality of a bond. Hence, higher-rated bonds are considered to be more stable and appropriate for investment purposes.
The United States government was correct in interfering with the growth of Standard Oil. Not only was the company taking advantage of existing situations, but eventually it would have controlled the oil market entirely. If Standard Oil was able to gain control of the market for a long period of time, consumers could have had to pay extremely high prices for the oil that they needed, limiting their purchase of other goods. Or Sample response: The United States government should not have interfered with the growth of Standard Oil. Because the company had managed to reduce production costs, it was able to offer very low prices to consumers. This benefited many Americans. Without the company's production benefits, citizens were not able to take advantage of this infrastructure.
Answer:
B. Portfolio B with E(R)=13% and STD=18%
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
Reward to risk ratio = (15% - 5%) ÷ 20% = 0.5
The porfolio should be in line i.e.
= 0.05 + 0.5 × standard deviation
For portfolio A
= 0.05 + 0.5 × 25
= 17.5%
For portfolio C
= 0.05 + 0.5 × 1
= 5.5%
Portfolio B, the std is 18%
So,
= 0.05 + 0.5 × 18%
= 14%
