Answer:
reduction in jasmine gross pay is = $94.32
Explanation:
Given data:
gross pay = $754.80
federal tax is $31
social securty tax 6.2%
Medicare tax is 1.45%
Paystate tax is 18%
reduction in jasmine gross pay is calculated as
Reduction = federal tax+ ( social security tax * gross pay) + (medicare tax * gross pay) + ( paystate tax * federal tax)
Reduction = 31 + ( 6.2% + 754.8) + (1.45% *754.8) + (0.18*31)
reduction in jasmine gross pay is = $94.32
Answer:
option D "The demand is unitary elastic."
Explanation:
Data provided:
At price, P1 = 3,000 units
Demand, D1 = $ 50
also,
at price P2 = $ 60
Demand, D2 = 2,500 units
Now,
the percentage change in price = 
or
the percentage change in price = 20%
and,
The percentage change in the quantity = 
or
The percentage change in the quantity = -20%
The elasticity in demand (Ed) is given as:
Ed = (Percentage change in quantity) / (Percentage change in price)
on substituting the values, we get
Ed = (-20%) / 20%
or
Ed = - 1
Here the negative sign depicts the inverse relation between the price and the demand.
hence, the correct answer is option D "The demand is unitary elastic."
Answer:
Current Ratio=1.93518
Explanation:
Calculating Current Assets:
Current Assets=Total assets-Net fixed assets
Current Assets=$537,800- $412,400
Current Assets=$125,400
Current Liabilities=Total debt- Long-term debt
Current Liabilities=$388,700- $323,900
Current Liabilities=$64,800
Current Ratio=
Current Ratio=1.93518
The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
