Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let’s start seeing what happens to the left. It stops before x = -1, but it continues to do down
so as x approaches -1, y approaches -oo
Now we have to see what happens to the right. In the case the graph doesn’t stop and it keeps to go up
so as x approaches oo, y approaches oo
Answer:
The lower confidence limit of the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion of Americans who were victims of identity theft is 0.0275.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of
, and a confidence level of
, we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

In which
z is the z-score that has a p-value of
.
A 2003 survey showed that 14 out of 250 Americans surveyed had suffered some kind of identity theft in the past 12 months.
This means that 
95% confidence level
So
, z is the value of Z that has a p-value of
, so
.
The lower limit of this interval is:

The lower confidence limit of the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion of Americans who were victims of identity theft is 0.0275.
Answer:
1. value is 0; x-3 is a factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . .third choice
2. evaluates at x = -1; remainder is -11 . . . . first choice
Step-by-step explanation:
Dividing f(x) by (x -a) gives ...
f(x)/(x -a) = g(x) +r/(x -a) . . . . some quotient and a remainder r
If we multiply this expression by (x -a), we see ...
f(x) = (x -a)g(x) +r
so
f(a) = (a -a)g(a) +r . . . . . evaluate the above equation at x=a
f(a) = 0 +r
f(a) = r . . . . . . . . . a statement of the remainder theorem
If r=0, then x-a is a factor of f(x) = (x-a)g(x).
___
1. We have "a" = 3, and f(3) = 0. Therefore (x-3) is a factor.
__
2. We have "a" = -1, and f(-1) = -11. Therefore the remainder from division by (x+1) is -11.
<u><em>Solution:</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Hope this helps!