Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Remark
Good thing to know. This is a rounding question.
A
Answer A is a bit nasty. I round 5 to the next highest number on the left. That may not be what you have been told to do. Let us round A to 5.7 and see if anything else does this.
B
Answer B rounds to 5.6
C
Answer C rounds to 5.6 as well. 3 is less than 5 so you round down.
D
Answer D rounds to 5.6(.) The zero has no effect on the 6.
Answer
Since there is nothing special about A and nothing else rounds to 5.7, the answer is A. So your rule is when the last number is 5, you round the second last number to one more than it was, regardless of the properties of the second last number.
Answer:
bruh
Step-by-step explanation:
Making a career decision is simple but important task. And a proper process needs to be followed. By a process, we can say choosing the subject interest, finding the career options in your interest area, figuring out the college and the cost of education. And most important working with patience and honesty is the fundamental to reach a zenith in your career.