Lets look at the info we have:-
23 orders for Pepsi.
15 orders for mountain dew.
Question:-
How many more orders have there been for Pepsi than for Mountain Dew?
To answer this we will subtract the amount of Pepsi's ordered by the amount of Mountain Dew's ordered. The answer will be the amount of more Pepsi's ordered than the Mountain Dew's.
23 - 15 = 8
8 more Pepsi's were sold than Mountain Dew's.
CHECK OUR WORK:-
15 + 8 = 23
We were RIGHT!!!
So, 8 more Pepsi's were ordered than Mountain Dew's.
Hope I helped ya!1 xD
The function 
is an exponential with base greater than 1. So, its range is 
, with 0 being the horizontal asymptote as 
.
If you multiply the function by 
, the range remains the same.
If you reflect it over the x-axis, you're changing the sign of the function. So, the new range is
The answer is 1.02 according to calculations
Answer:
D. If John owns a dog, then he owns a cat
Step-by-step explanation:
The implication p → q (if p, then q) has the same truth table as the logical expression ~p∨q. You have the expression ...
~(John owns a dog) ∨ (he owns a cat)
Matching parts of this expression to the components of the expression ~p∨q, we see we can choose ...
- p = John owns a dog
- q = he owns a cat
and put those into the structure of the implication: if p, then q.
If John owns a dog, then he owns a cat. . . . . matches choice D
6 cups of flour because if u multiply the sugar by 2 you have to do that to the flour.
so 3*2 is 6
