Answer:
d. Health insurers under the 2020 Final Rule are not considered to be principally engaged in delivering health care, and thus lines of business that do not receive federal funding or administered under Title I of the ACA, such as life insurance, do not fall under the scope of 1557.
Explanation:
The 2020 Final rule which was approved on June 12 of this year by the Trump administration made some corrections to the former 2016 final rule. Under this new rule, bodies that are meant to adhere to the final rule were described as those who are principally engaged in providing healthcare as well as bodies that receive funding from the government or any of its agencies. The health insurers do not fall under this category.
In this new final rule, the different considerations made on the basis of gender identity under the 2016 final rule were also revised and annulled.
<em>Hi,</em>
Answer:
<em>In most cases, the victim spontaneously and quickly regains consciousness.</em>
What should the patient care technician have done when the patient complained of dizziness?
If it's not the case :
<em>- leave the victim lying on the ground,</em>
- elevate their legs (using a chair or stool),
<em>- stay with her until she wakes up</em>.
<em />
<em>Preventing emergency services: a few rare cases</em>
<em>When a person faints, it is very rare to call for help.</em>
This will only be done if the victim:
<em>-slow to regain consciousness</em>
Answer:
Explanation: the first one
Michael can enroll during open or annual time duration in a different CSNP that also covers diabetes.
<h3>What is Diabetes?</h3>
Diabetes may be defined as a disorder that appears when your blood glucose level is too high due to no synthesis of insulin hormone or maybe other reasons as well.
It may be required for the patient to keep patience while the treatment is going in one C-SNP. Let's take some time, observe the differences communicate with your healthcare providers, then if you are not satisfied, enroll in another C-SNP during the open or annual time period.
Therefore, it is well described above.
To learn more about Diabetes, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/504794
#SPJ1
Answer:
an ethical argument for would be the emotional response which is normally positive, a child expresses when they see a new toy or game in a store or on tv that they would enjoy. A ethical argument against would be to say it is innapropriate to advertise products to young children who are easily swayed and mislead.
Explanation:
