<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Why is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model but NOT in the classical model?
A) The Keynesian model assumes that the level of real GDP is inflexible.
B) The Keynesian model assumes that people work for motives other than those of earning an income for themselves and supporting a family.
C) The Keynesian model assumes that workers can lose their jobs to foreign competition during economic downturns.
D) The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward.
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward - is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The classical model is quite the usual microeconomic principles. Keynes claimed that the classical model is not common. In the classical model, the basis for the rationalizing is notional demand and supply, which implies market equilibrium. Keynes proposed the idea of aggregate demand, the overall demand for products and services in the economy.
Keynes supposed that the unemployment force persists regularly. Keynes was suspicious that the economic dominance of demand and supply drive the economy to a common equilibrium. Rising government spending or cutting taxes will boost aggregate demand.
<u />
Answer:

Explanation:
Let's analyze each answer choice.
A. Gulf of Mexico: to the <u>south </u>of North America
B. Pacific Ocean: to the <em>west </em>of North America
C. Atlantic Ocean: to the <em>east </em>of North America
D. Arctic Ocean: to the <em>north</em> of North America
Since we want to find the body of water south of North America, the Gulf of Mexico is the correct answer.
Can your question be a bit more specific please? It could be anything from a certain species of plant or animal to a land region to agriculture and domesticated plants and animals.
Answer:
Mona lisa
Explanation:
Leonardo da vinci's painted Mona lisa which became famous
Answer:
“Human and geographical” is a term short for the relationships between human and geography environment. ... The geography can exist without human beings, but human beings can not exist without the earth, which means that the relations between human and geography is the relations that human beings depend on geography.
Explanation:
i used it as my answer, hope it helps, please mark as brainliest