<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
B is true because 0-(-x) = 0 + x = x
Answer:
x = -3
Step-by-step explanation:
3x –7 = -16
3x = -16 + 7
3x = -9
x = -3
75% of what is 0.90
0.75x = 0.90
x = 0.90/0.75
x = 1.20 <== restaurant pays $ 1.20 wholesale
<h3>
Answer: 54 gallons</h3>
Work Shown:
(distance)/(gallons used) = (distance)/(gallons used)
(333 miles)/(37 gallons) = (486 miles)/(x gallons)
333/37 = 486/x
333x = 37*486 .... cross multiplication
333x = 17,982
x = (17,982)/333
x = 54 gallons
You need 54 gallons to travel 486 miles.