Answer:
The correct answer is The opportunity cost of an additional 100 dolls increases as more dolls are produced.
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is understood as the cost incurred in making a decision and not another. It is that value or utility that is sacrificed for choosing an alternative A and neglecting an alternative B. Taking a path means that the benefit offered by the discarded path is waived.
In any decision taken there is an implicit waiver of the utility or benefits that could have been obtained if any other decision had been made.
For each situation there is always more than one way to address it, and each form offers a greater or lesser utility than the others, therefore, whenever one or the other decision is made, the opportunities and possibilities offered by the others will have been renounced, that may be better or worse (opportunity cost greater or lesser).
I believe the answer is: Self selection
Self-selection begin with self-introspection in order to find out what we truly desire from our career and the skill sets that we have from our personalities, knowledge and experience.
After that, we pinpoint this data with the type of job that exist in the market and the criteria that is expected by the employers. Doing self selection before picking a job would increase the rate of job satisfaction.
<span>The contractual standard for product safety and liability that says the buyer chose to make the purchases and knows the each purchase involves informed consent is often referred to as the standard of caveat emptor. This is simply a warning that lets the buyer know and understand the product is sold as is and is subject to all defects. Basically, another way of saying buyer be ware.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Assume the initial invest at the beginning is $100.
The investment at end of year 4 is:
100 x 1.16 x 1.11 x 1.1 x 1.1 = 155.80
a) CAGR over the 4 years = (155.8 / 100 ) ^ (1/4) = 11.72%
b) Average annual return over 4 years = (16% +11% + 10% +10%) /4 = 11.75%
c) Since the returns over the 4 year period are not much volatile, average annual return is a better measure.
If the investment's returns are independent and identically distributed, Average annual return will be the better measure because there is no correlation between returns over the years and thus there is no point to take into consideration the compounding effect by using CAGR.
