All categories

3 years ago

George said if 2 and 4 are factors of a number, then 8 is a factor of the whole number. is he correct explain

1 answer:

8 0

He is correct and incorrect. 2 and 4 can create factors but they can also be factors of other numbers. So 8 can be a factor of bigger whole numbers and can also have it own smaller factors.

You might be interested in

If you add or subtract two rational numbers, is the result sometimes, always, or never rational?

lawyer [7]

Answer:

Always

Step-by-step explanation:

8 - 9 = -1

1/3 - 1/6 = 1/6 are 2 examples

8 0

3 years ago

Determine if true:<br> 8x2-63=-40

prohojiy [21]

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

8x2=16

16-63=-47

-47=-40

The numbers do not match.

Hence, the equation is false.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

-1/4×3/5×-2/5 what dose this Equal

Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

0.06

Step-by-step explanation:

Just type it into your calculator. For me its easier to not try and do it in your head. Plus you'll always have a calculator with you if you have a phone.

6 0

3 years ago

ZEARN MATH

joja [24]

Answer:

ok ill do it :-)

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

fatima claims that the distribution of u is uniform with a median of 0.4 field goal percentage. is fatima’s claim supported by t

Amanda [17]

Fatima's claim is not supported by the table because, the distribution is skewed right, with a median of 0.4 field goal advantage.

From the table, the median position is calculated as:

$\mathbf{Median = \frac{1}{5} th}$

$\mathbf{Median = 0.2\ nd }$

The 0.2nd data falls in the 0.4 field goal category.

So, the median element is:

$\mathbf{Median = 0.4}$

However, the distribution of the table are concentrated on the left.

This means that, the distribution is not uniform, instead it is skewed right.

A uniform distribution has a skewness of 0.

Hence, Fatima's claim is not supported by the table