What would Piaget say most likely in this behavior is that the behavior that the child is showing means that it has the signs of means-end behavior and emerging object permanence. It is because in means end behavior, is a way of doing or showing a specific behavior in which could be expected or unexpected in which they carry out to achieve something they want or their goal. While the emerging object permanence is a way of having a belief that inanimate objects does exist. It could be seen above as the child continues the behavior because of his belief that the food will reappear, in the same time, he has the belief that the food will be produced because he thinks that it would exist with just the push of the button.
Answer:
Janet stops parking in handicapped spaces after she gets a big parking ticket. - Positive Punishment
Peter’s recess is taken away to discourage him from getting into fights with the other children. - Negative Punishment
Ted increases paying his bills on time to avoid a late fee. - Negative Reinforcement
Sally increases the amount of work she completes to receive more pay. - Positive Reinforcement
Explanation:
In operant conditioning, the main principle is that behavior increases or decreases its frequency depending on whether it's reinforced or punished. A behavior can be reinforced by giving something the subject appreciates, like more pay for their work (positive reinforcement) or taking away something they dislike, like late fees (negative reinforcement). Punishments work the same way, you can give something the subject dislikes, like a parking ticket, (positive punishment) or taking away something they like recess for a child. (negative punishment).
The appropriate response is literary summary. It is analyzing the distinctive components of a bit of writing to enable you to better acknowledge and comprehend its work in general. This procedure expects you to utilize the honed, centered articulation of thought and concentrate into the literary work, particularly a limited area of it.
Answer:
Yes. Southam's research was "more wrong"
Explanation:
They both didn't seek the informed consent of their patients and we're both wrong. However, Southam injected patients(both healthy and unhealthy) with cancerous cells to see how their bodies would react. This was terribly wrong seeing that he put unsuspecting patients in danger. Elsie on the other hand, collected tissue samples from his patients to conduct his research which is a clear violation of their rights but clearly not as deadly as Southam's.
<span>Envy, gossip, and intolerance are manifestations of : depreciation
People do not like to feel inferior compared to another human. In this kind of tendency, people have the drive to put other people down in order to feel superior and better about themselves. </span>
