Answer:
$14,000
Explanation:
Amount of interest expense = [(Bond issued by 'S' company x 9%) - Amount of
premium x (unsold bonds / Bonds issued)]
= (300,000 x 0.09) - 60000/10 x 200,000/300,000
= (27,000 - 6000) x 0.66667
= 21,000 x 0.66667
= $14,000
<span>25 years: No Payment, but total is 250000
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1/2 year later is P(1+0.03)
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1 year later is P(1+0.03)^2
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1½ years later is P(1+0.03)^3
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 2 years later is P(1+0.03)^4
</span><span>We need to recognize these patterns. Similarly, we can identify the accumulated value of all 50 payments of "P". Starting from the last payment normally is most clear.
</span>
<span>P(1.03) + P(1.03)^2 + P(1.03)^3 + ... + P(1.03)^50
That needs to make sense. After that, it's an algebra problem.
P[(1.03) + (1.03)^2 + (1.03)^3 + ... + (1.03)^50]
</span>
P(<span><span>1.03−<span>1.03^51)/(</span></span><span>1−1.03) </span></span>= <span>250000</span>
Answer:
an externality
Explanation:
Externality -
It is the cost or the benefit received by the third party , is known as externality .
The third party does not have any control over the creation of the cost or the benefit .
The externality can be negative as well as positive and can arise from the production or consumption of the services and goods .
hence , the correct term fro the given statement is an externality .
Answer:
Answer is option a, i.e. trade-offs and connections may differ in short run and the long run.
Explanation:
Keynes' law in economics and Say's law in economics are contradictory in their perspective. Where Keynes' law says that it is the demand that creates the supply, on the other hand, Say's law states that its the supply that tends to create the demand. But, we cannot neglect any of the above facts as demand and supply cant operate independently. So, on combining the two laws, we happen to take both the given laws into account. Also, it is found that Keynes' law is more appropriate and accurate for the short-run whereas, Say's law is for the long run. This thus creates trade-offs and connections that differ in the short-run and long-run by affecting the three important goals of macroeconomics, i.e. higher standard of living, low inflation, and low unemployment.
