1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maw [93]
3 years ago
13

Which descriptions of the Maya's civilization are true?

History
2 answers:
-Dominant- [34]3 years ago
4 0
Maya's civilization practices are:
c) predicted eclipses and developed a 365-day calendar
d) made human sacrifices to appease the gods

Other facts about Maya's Civilization are:
1) Maya were fierce and warlike based on the the glyphs discovered and studied by modern researchers.
2) Maya were literate and had a written language and books
3) Maya believed that the Sun, Moon, and Planets were gods moving back and forth between the heavens, the underworld, and the earth.
4) Maya were extensive traders. They traded for prestige items(luxuries) and subsistence items(basic necessities).
5) Maya had royal families. Maya rulers claimed to be descended directly from the sun, moon or planets, giving them divine ancestry.
azamat3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

it is B,C

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Describe the civilization that existed in the Indus Valley.
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

The Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) was a Bronze Age civilization in the northwestern regions of South Asia, lasting from 3300 BC to 1300 BC, and in its mature form from 2600 BC to 1900 BC. Along with ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia it was one of three early civilisations of the region comprising North Africa, West Asia and South Asia, and of the three, the most widespread, its sites spanning an area stretching from northeast Afghanistan, through much of Pakistan, and into western and northwestern India. It flourished in the basins of the Indus River, which flows through the length of Pakistan, and along a system of perennial, mostly monsoon-fed, rivers that once coursed in the vicinity of the seasonal Ghaggar-Hakra river in northwest India and eastern Pakistan.

The civilization's cities were noted for their urban planning, baked brick houses, elaborate drainage systems, water supply systems, clusters of large non-residential buildings, and new techniques in handicraft (carnelian products, seal carving) and metallurgy (copper, bronze, lead, and tin). The large cities of Mohenjo-daro and Harappa very likely grew to containing between 30,000 and 60,000 individuals, and the civilisation itself during its florescence may have contained between one and five million individuals. Gradual drying of the region's soil during the 3rd millennium BC may have been the initial spur for the urbanisation associated with the civilisation, but eventually also reduced the water supply enough to cause the civilization's demise, and to scatter its population eastward.

Hope this helps! Please mark as brainliest.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the rise of constantinople contribute to roman culture
Klio2033 [76]
I think Roman culture was abandoned after Constantinople's leader was overthrown by a Germanic prince. 
8 0
3 years ago
Assessment of Columbus
34kurt

Answer:

https://www.columbus.gov/communityhealthassessment/

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Iready The first women's rights convention
svetlana [45]

braniest please

the Seneca Falls Convention

On July 19, 1848, the Seneca Falls Convention convened. Heralded as the first American women's rights convention, the two day event was held in the Wesleyan Chapel in Seneca Falls, New York. The convention had been advertised on July 11, 1848 in the Seneca County Courier.

5 0
3 years ago
What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Iroquois and the Cherokee were the first
    8·2 answers
  • Why didn't george washington sign the declaration?
    12·2 answers
  • What was the goal of the farmers when they met at independence hall? how did the goal change?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the definition of foreign policy
    13·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast the domestic and factory methods of production
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the American public's reaction to reading The Jungle?
    11·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast Andrew Jackson's spoils system to the "corrupt bargain" he blamed for his defeat in the 1824 election.
    7·1 answer
  • What were trade routes like in western Arabia?
    6·1 answer
  • What are two historical examples of federalism in the years of 1790-2000
    8·1 answer
  • Which ancient egyptian god was depicted with the head of a jackal?.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!