1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
miskamm [114]
3 years ago
13

The police are questioning stuart and they tell him that they have a witness who saw him outside the victimõs apartment. this is

not true; they have no such witness. are the police allowed to use a trick like this when they are trying to get a confession?
Social Studies
2 answers:
lakkis [162]3 years ago
6 0
Yes, they're allowed to use tricks like that to get a confession.

United States' legal system allow police officers to lie about having a witness when they're conducting an investigation in order to open an opportunity for a bargain. What they're not allowed to do is lying about the punishment that could be charged to the suspect.
Lesechka [4]3 years ago
6 0

The police are allowed to use the psychological trick to get someone’s confession. The police are not allowed to use physical force but are allowed to use the psychological trick in interrogation.  

 

EXPLANATION

The confessions of a suspect must be given voluntarily. The police should not use physical force to coerce a suspect into confessing. Even though police have been prohibited to use physical force as a weapon to get a confession, they are allowed to use psychological tricks to get someone’s confession. The most common psychological tricks that the police use is deception.  

 

As an example, police are allowed to tell the suspect that they found the suspect’s fingerprint and DNA evidence in the crime scene, while in reality, the police didn’t find anything. The government permits the police to use deception for factual matters. The police can use this to get the real and most truthful confession from the suspect.

 

Even if psychological tricks are allowed, but there are not applied without limits. One thing that the police are not allowed to use is telling lies about legal rights. For example, the police should not misinterpret the legal rights of a defendant by telling the suspect that their confession will not be used to charge them.

 

For example, the police shouldn’t tell a suspect that they believe the murder is accidental and they will not get arrested or threatened to arrest the suspect’s family. Even though psychological tricks are allowed, they still have to be used within rules and limitations.

Learn more

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

Tricking suspect into confessing: brainly.com/question/7098009

Meaning of deception: brainly.com/question/11268203

Keyword: Psychological tricks, police, interogation

Subject: Social studies

Class: College

Subchapter: Psychology

You might be interested in
When a supreme court justice agrees with the decision reached by the court in a case, but not with the reasons why the court mad
Vladimir [108]
Concurring opinion.

A concurring opinion is an opinion written by a Supreme Court justice who agrees with the decision and who the case went to, but may want to add to or comment on part of the decision. On the other hand, a dissenting opinion is by a judge who did not agree with the court decision, and writes down why he/she disagreed.
5 0
3 years ago
What effect did the self-sufficiency of the Southern plantations have on the growth of cities in the South?
balandron [24]

Answer: It slowed down growth.

Explanation:

It lead to a situation where by lots of people were not able to compete with the huge plantation and this made people move away, thus slowing down growth.

6 0
3 years ago
2 words I have to underline which one do I underline pls tell me
crimeas [40]

Answer:

1) it tells us how to run our government

2) it tells us how to make laws that keep us safe

5 0
3 years ago
Where should a pronoun be placed? anywhere in the sentence somewhere before the antecedent as close to the antecedent as possibl
Vsevolod [243]
The answer is: As close to the antecedent as possible<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the best way to define the word autonomy when it comes to ethical decision making? (Points : 1) Having the freedom to do
kifflom [539]
Well, two answers are very close and in a way both correct:


Having the freedom to do whatever someone wants

<span>Having the freedom to make decisions that align with one s desires, goals, and social context

I would say the second one is better- one is rarely really free to do everything, as one is limited by resources etc, but autonomy would still mean being able to </span><span><span>make decisions that align with one s desires, goals, and social context.</span> </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are rain and wind examples of?
    12·2 answers
  • Why does winthrop use an analogy to the status of women within the family to explain his understanding liberty?
    14·1 answer
  • A dictator could be defined by which of the following actions?
    8·1 answer
  • Today many Americans believe that our government must follow the same principles outline by the founders and no others how do yo
    9·1 answer
  • What does "Q” represent on the graph?
    13·2 answers
  • Discuss the philosophies of Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibnitz. How did they affect the Baroque era? Are there parts of their phil
    9·1 answer
  • Why the Articles of Confederation was tossed out,​
    6·2 answers
  • What is one population change that took place in Mexico during the age of exploration
    11·1 answer
  • Expulsion is illistrated by
    7·1 answer
  • magbahagi ng opinyon o kuro-kuro bilang mag aaral kung bakit maraming kabataan ang nahuhumaling sa paggamit ng internet​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!