Answer:
D) $1120
Explanation:
The goods Sally purchase were $1440, and with the 25% discount, she would have paid $1080, because 25% of $1440 is $360. Since she returned 1/3, she would have only spent $720, because $1080/3 is also $360. $720+$400 from the beginning would be $1120
Traditional predictive project management and the PMI's Project Management Body of Knowledge remain inextricably linked, notwithstanding changes made in the Sixth Edition (PMBoK).
Concerns for Agile/Adaptive Environments are covered in each of its 10 Knowledge Areas. But generally, they are only two or three paragraphs long. The primary goal is raising awareness.
The organization's own Agile Project Management qualification is designated as a PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP). The PMI-ACP is also the certification with the fastest growth.
Instead of calling Scrum a methodology, Schwaber refers to it as a framework. This is mainly because many people associate the word "methodology" with being prescriptive in character.
To learn more about PMI's here
brainly.com/question/17460312
#SPJ4
Answer:
see below
Explanation:
The concept of limited liability is a confirmation that a corporation's assets are liabilities are distinct from those of shareholders. The concepts safeguard the shareholder's private properties should a business fail to meet its obligations.
Limited liability states that the liabilities of a shareholder is limited to the extent of his capital contribution. If the event of a dissolution, a shareholder's losses are capped to the share contribution. Their personal properties cannot be used to pay business debts should the business's assets be inadequate.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following image.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
Answer:
e. $638
Explanation:
payment to be made as per forward contract (IN $)
= 39960/ 1.682
= $23757.43
now the actual rate after 90 days is 1.638
payment at 1.638 rate = 39960/ 1.638
= $24395.6
loss by hedging = $24395.6 - $23757.43
= $638.17
Therefore, The U.S. firm have saved or lost $638 in U.S. dollars by hedging its exchange rate exposure.
