Answer:
The correct answer is: an expansionary gap; decrease the money supply.
Explanation:
An expansionary gap is when genuine output surpasses potential output. At the end of the day, the economy is incidentally working over its long-run potential as estimated by real GDP.
Answer:
Dr Work in process $13,210
Cr Wages payable $13,210
Explanation:
Based on the information given the appropriate journal entry to record the flow of labor costs into production during August is:
Dr Work in process $13,210
Cr Wages payable $13,210
(580*$13)+(630*$9)
($7540+$5670)
(To record the flow of labor costs into production during August)
Answer:
A. -0.80
B. 2.20
Explanation:
A. Calculation for your net profit on the option if Pfizer’s stock price does not change over the life of the option
Net profit per share=max(53-55,0)-0.80
Net profit per share=0-0.80
Net profit per share=-0.80
Therefore your net profit on the option if Pfizer’s stock price does not change over the life of the option is -0.80
b. Calculation for your net profit on the option if Pfizer’s stock price falls to $50 and you exercise the option
Net profit per share
=max(53-50,0)-0.80
Net profit per share=3-0.80
Net profit per share=2.20
Therefore your net profit on the option if Pfizer’s stock price falls to $50 and you exercise the option is 2.20
Important meetings between a portfolio manager and his or her team of analysts take place in what is sometimes called "the war room" because that is where business strategies are discussed and formulated.
<h3>What is Business Strategy?</h3>
This refers to the set plans and actions that a business takes in order to get ahead of its competition and maximize profit.
With this in mind, the strategy room is called a war room because business is effectively war, especially in a capitalist system and the portfolio manager meets with his team of analysts in order to discuss business strategies.
Read more about business strategy here:
brainly.com/question/24967768
Answer:
A. Jack cannot bring in the evidence of the oral agreement because of the Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that governs or determines the types or kinds of evidence that parties to a contract dispute can introduce when trying to determine the specific terms of a contract.
The rule also prevents introduction of further evidences by a party after a final written document or agreement has been reached. Things such as the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract. The rule states that "extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary a written contract". The term " patrol" refers to "word of mouth" hence it is referred to oral pleadings in a court case.
Therefore from the question, Jack cannot bring in evidence of oral agreement into the court for evaluation because of Patrol Evidence Rule.
