<u>The different between 32 bit and 64 bit version:</u>
- The main difference between 32-bit and 64-bit versions is that a 32-bit version can access
memory addresses which is roughly equivalent to 4 GB of memory.
- On the other hand, a 64-bit version can access
memory addresses which equates to a huge amount of memory, 16 exabytes to be precise.
- Nowadays, we observe that almost all the computers have 64-bit processors, which means that they can access any amount of memory over 4 GB till 16 exabytes.
- 64-bit processors have various advantages like the increased speed of operations, smooth multitasking and they can also support video games and software's that have high graphical requirements.
Answer:
Primary memory is directly accessible by Processor/CPU. Secondary memory is not directly accessible by the CPU. ... The memory devices used for primary memory are semiconductor memories. The secondary memory devices are magnetic and optical memories
Answer:
Following are the code to this question:
please find the attached file.
Explanation:
In this code, four class "novels, magazines, technical journals, and textbooks", is defined, in which it holds their respective default constructor and the get and set method to hold the string and integer value, and in the book class the main method is defined, that creates its object and a switch to for search value and print its value.
Answer:
It is A: Packet metadata is used to route and reassemble information travelling through the internet.
Explanation:
Step 1: The Internet works by chopping data into chunks called packets. Each packet then moves through the network in a series of hops. Each packet hops to a local Internet service provider (ISP), a company that offers access to the network -- usually for a fee
Step 2: Entering the network
Each packet hops to a local Internet service provider (ISP), a company that offers access to the network -- usually for a fee.
Step 3: Taking flight
The next hop delivers the packet to a long-haul provider, one of the airlines of cyberspace that quickly carrying data across the world.
Step 4: BGP
These providers use the Border Gateway Protocol to find a route across the many individual networks that together form the Internet.
Step 5: Finding a route
This journey often takes several more hops, which are plotted out one by one as the data packet moves across the Internet.
Step 6: Bad information
For the system to work properly, the BGP information shared among routers cannot contain lies or errors that might cause a packet to go off track – or get lost altogether.
Last step: Arrival
The final hop takes a packet to the recipient, which reassembles all of the packets into a coherent message. A separate message goes back through the network confirming successful delivery.
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
