Answer:
The amount of the cost of goods sold for this sale is $98.4
Explanation:
Marquis Company uses a weighted-average perpetual inventory system
August 2, 22 units were purchased at $3 per unit,
Total cost = $3 x 22 = $66
Average cost per unit: $3
August 18, 27 units were purchased at $5 per unit
Total inventory = $66 + $5 x 27 = $201
Average cost per unit = $201/(22+27) = $4.1
August 29, 24 units were sold
Cost of goods sold = 24 x $4.1 = $98.4
Answer:
The total amount of dividends paid over these three years is $8,600
Explanation:
The computation of the total amount of dividend for three years is shown below:
= Net income for first-year - net loss for the second year + net loss for the third year - ending retained earning balance
= $6,700 - $1,200 + $3,800 - $700
= $8,600
As we know,
The ending balance of retained earning = Beginning balance of retained earnings + net income - dividend paid
So, we apply the same formula to compute the dividend amount
Answer:
Net Sales
Gross Revenue $101,200
Less:
Sales Discount $288
Sales Returns <u> $1,000 </u> <u> $1,288</u>
Net Sales $99,912
Gross revenue = 83,200 + 18,000 = $101,200
Gross Profit
Net Sales $99,912
Less: Cost of Goods sold <u> ($52,747)</u>
Gross Profit $47,165
Cost of goods sold
= 44,797 - 600 + 8,550
= $52,747
Answer:
Katie Kwasi's Utility Function
The units of x1 that she will consume after the change in income is:
= 40 units of x1
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Katie Kwasi’s utility function, U(x1, x2) = 2(ln x1) + x2
Current consumption = 10 units of x1 and 15 units of x2
When her income doubles, with prices staying constant, Katie will consume:
= 2(2 * 10 of x1) + 15 of x2
= 40 units of x1 + 15 units of x2
Therefore, she will consume 40 units of x1 and 15 units of x2
b) The above function expresses mathematically Katie's utility to be a function of the units of x1 and x2 that she can consume, given her income constraint. If her income doubles, Katie will consume double units of x1 and the same units of x2 as she was consuming before the change in income.
Based on the information given regarding the monopoly power, the remedy by the court will be<u> divesting itself of the control or ownership of</u><u> Child Shops</u>.
It should be noted that antitrust laws are put in place in order to protect consumers from business practices that are predatory and also ensure fair competition.
Since antitrust laws recommend the breaking of certain business conducts, there'll be the divesting of the company of the control or ownership of Child Shops.
Learn more about monopoly on:
brainly.com/question/13113415
