Answer:
$3
$2
$1
False
Explanation:
The burden of tax refers to who pays the tax between the buyer and the seller.
More burden of tax usually falls to the party with the more inelastic demand because the quantity demanded would not change despite the increase in price as a result of the tax.
To find the amount of tax per bottle = price of wine - amount received by producers = $6 - $3 = $3
The amount paid by consumers = price after tax - price before tax = $6 - $4 = $2
Amount received by sellers = tax- amount paid by consumers = $3 - $2 = $1
It can be seen that consumers bear a higher burden of tax because they pay the greater tax. This means they have an inelastic demand.
If the tax had been levied on producers, the effect on quantity demanded would have been greater because producers have a more less elastic supply when compared to consumers .
I hope my answer helps you
Mrs. Brown has to follow the provincial law regime.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The basic difference between federal and provincial law is that federal law or the federal government enacts laws and legislation for all the state of the country while provincial laws are those laws that are for the specific province or state. Furthermore, the Federal government has the authority to enact criminal laws and enactments while the provincial law has got no such authority.
- The Canadian Federal Government is solely responsible for making laws and legislation that covers and impacts the entire country while the provincial government has the authority to make enactments which directly impacts and concerns their territory. The federal laws concern laws governing the national interest of the country including national defense, criminal law, and national postal services while health care, public education, and highways are part of provincial government legislation.
- In the given question, Mrs. Brown who is a lawyer by profession wants to create a company to operate her business activities in all provinces and territories - this is a situation which requires provincial law to be implemented since it concerns the business formation and it's operation for an individual and hence doesn't concerns the national interest of the country.
Answer:
$0.875
Explanation:
The computation of the stock price that changes upon the announcement is shown below:
As it given that
The corporate tax is 35%
So there is an effective disadvantage i.e. retention
Also, the stock price would be decline by 35% of cash
i.e.
= 35% × $250 million ÷ 100 million outstanding
= $0.875
Hence, the stock price is $0.875
Answer:
4.92%
Explanation:
we have to calculate the market price of the bond in one year from now but in order to do this we have to calculate the yield to maturity:
YTM = {80 + [(1,000 - 750)/10] / [(1,000 + 750)/2] = 105 / 875 = 12%
the market price of the bond in one year is:
PV of face value = $1,000 / 1.12⁹ = $360.61
PV of coupon payments = $80 x 5.3282 (PV annuity factor, 12%, 9 periods) = $426.26
market price one year from now = $786.87
capital gains yield = ($786.87 - $750) / $750 = 4.92%
Answer:
The correct answer is $16,000.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Cash received = $12,000
Fair market value of the property = $20,500
Tax basis of stock = $16,500
So, we can calculate the amount of gain by using the following formula:
Amount of gain = Cash received + Fair market value of the property - Tax basis of stock
By putting the value in the formula, we get:
Amount of gain = $12,000 + $20,500 - $16,500
= $16,000.
