The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The part of the Constitution explains its purpose as, “to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” is the Preamble.
Indeed, the Preamble is the opening paragraph of the United States Constitution.
Delegates of the colonies met at the Constitutional Convention held in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from May to September 1787 to decide the kind of government that the new nation was going to have. There were sounded debates between federalists such as Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, with antifederalists such as Thomas Jefferson. Federalists supported a strong central government. Antifederalists were against it. Finally, James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights and both parties agreed to sign the Constitution.
Which do you think would be the hardest pillar to fulfill.
<span>1.Shahadah - Declaration of faith </span>
<span>2.Salah - Prayer [5 prayers a day] </span>
<span>3.Zakah - Charity [Giving 2.5% to a charity] </span>
<span>4.Sawn - Fasting </span>
<span>5.Hajj - Pilgrimage. </span>
<span>For me it would be Hajj cause I don't like traveling. </span>
<span>Also in todays society and where I live , Salah would be pretty hard to follow as well. </span>
<span>I'm not posting this Q to waste time by the way.Its Homework for R.S</span>
The correct answer is Universal conduct, based on Universal values
Happiness is the state in which a rational being is found in the world for whom, in all his existence, everything goes according to his desire and will; consequently, it presupposes the agreement of nature with all the ends of this being, and simultaneously with the essential foundation of determining its will. Now the moral law, as a law of freedom, obliges by means of foundations of determination, which must be entirely independent of nature and its agreement with our faculty of desire (as an engine). However, the rational agent that acts in the world is not simultaneously the cause of the world and of nature itself. Thus, in the moral law, there is no basis for a necessary connection between morality and happiness, provided with it, in a being that, being part of the world, depends on it; this being, precisely for this reason, cannot voluntarily be the cause of this nature nor, as far as happiness is concerned, make it, by its own strength, perfectly coincide with its own practical principles.
