The United States Congress adopted termination as its new approach to dealing with American Indians in 1953.
This program terminated the protected trust status of all Indian-owned lands and significantly reduced government assistance for Indian tribes. The BIA launched an urban relocation program that was optional in reaction to this policy.
Thus, Option C is correct.
<h3>What reason did the US begin transferring Americans?</h3>
The intention was to relocate Native Americans to urban areas where they would eventually vanish after assimilating into the majority-white population of the United States.
As a result, the government would open up tribal land for development and taxation.
For more information about the Relocation program refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/12072272
#SPJ1
If you’re talking about the United States, I would definitely say the Southern region especially the Southeast.
Elsewhere in the world, for example in Africa, the country of South Africa has been terrible to African Americans.
Answer:
Public Works Administration (PWA), in U.S. history, New Deal government agency (1933–39) designed to reduce unemployment and increase purchasing power through the construction of highways and public buildings.
Explanation:
The Federalists favored a strong central government and the democratic republic did not favor a strong central government.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Federalists were different from the democratic republics. The federalist favored that there should be a strong central government to administer the country where as this was not favored by the democratic republic. They did not want a strong government in the center.
The federalist encouraged commerce and manufacturing where as this was not encouraged by the democrat republic. The federalist were not in the favor of egalitarian where as the democrat republic unlike the Federalist were some what egalitarian.
Answer: 34 to 36 million
Explanation: HIV/AIDS has shaken the already weak economic and social infrastructures of many developing countries. While the majority of infections occur in young adults, children have been affected in numerous ways. Almost three million children younger than 15 years of age are estimated to be HIV-positive, with the vast majority of infections occurring in developing nations (1). As home to 10% of the world’s population but 70% of HIV infections, Sub-Saharan Africa carries the largest disease burden (2). Thirteen million children younger than 15 years of age have lost one or both parents to AIDS, with the number expected to rise to 25 million by 2010 (1). In several African countries, 15% of children are expected to be orphaned by the end of this decade (1).
