Hello there!
The answer to this question will be answer choice A.
When using the SAS postulate, we need two pairs of sides and the pair of the angles between those two sides to be congruent.
It is given that one pair of sides are congruent, along with a pair of congruent angles.
We want the congruent angle to be between two congruent sides, thus AC must be congruent to EC in order for these triangles to be proven congruent by the SAS postulate.
Hope this helps and have an awesome day! :)
❄ Hi there,
let us start by considering this: What should we do to get x all by itself?
Since it's
- divided by 4
- multiplied by -1
we should
- multiply (both sides) by 4
- divide (both sides) by -1
So, let's start.
When we divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, we do "the inequality flip" and <em>flip the inequality sign</em>.
❄
33 would round down. (30)
This is because the second 3 is smaller than 5 and when your rounding, if number your rounding is smaller then 5 you will round down
89 would round up. (90)
This is because the 9 is larger than 5 which means you would round up.
Please mark brainlies
