<span>The law of conservation of energy states that energy can change from one form into another, but it cannot be created or destroyed. Or the general definition is: The totalenergy of an isolated system remains constant over time. ... A device that demonstrates the Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy and Momentum.</span>
Answer:
Before the Journey, Hispaniola and Hurricane, Across the Caribbean, and Hurricane
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
Answer: D) Sacrifice the soundness of a decision in order to achieve interpersonal harmony
Explanation: Group thinking involves more and more diverse suggestions for solving a problem, as there are multiple different attitudes and views within the group. It can also mean many different possible solutions, so the option to choose the best ones. There may also be a situation where the objective best solution is often not chosen in order to reach a compromise among the members of the group, because in the group one must always count on vanities and egos. It can also lead to slow and often ineffective decision making until all the solutions offered are reviewed. However, the worst-case scenario is to intentionally sacrifice the right solution for the sake of interpersonal harmony. This means that the group essentially did not meet to find the best solution, but to treat the excessive vanities and egos of its members.
