Hello! The answer is definitely not C or D, because that's way too i God an increase for this type of setting. It increased by around 20%, because when 35 and 29 are divided and you multiply the decimal by 100, when you ignore the "1" at the front, it shows an approximate 20% increase. The answer is A.
The given statement is:
An integer is divisible by 100 if and only if its last two digits are zeros
The two conditional statements that can be made are:
1) If an integer is divisible by 100 its last two digits are zeros.
This is a true statement. If a number is divisible by 100, it means 100 must be a factor of that number. When 100 will be multiplied by the remaining factors, the number will have last two digits zeros.
2) If the last two digits of an integer are zeros, it is divisible by 100.
This is also true. If last two digits are zeros, this means 100 is a factor of the integer. So the number will be divisible by 100.
Therefore, the two conditional statements that are formed are both true.
So, the option A is the correct answer.
Yes, it is. When the definition is separated into two conditional statements, both of the statements are true
82 is the answer now sub to pooi thegreat on yt
Answer:
it would be J
Step-by-step explanation:
the number line is going 1 in both directions from zero, the question is asking you to find what -1/2 is on the other side of the number line, so you are looking for 1/2 k is 1/4 and L is -1/4
Answer:
x≥72
Step-by-step explanation:
Put into an equation then solve.
x/8≥9
x8 x8
x≥72
Hope that helped!
