Yeah there is not question or upload up there
Answer:
a.9.313hr
b.116.4%
c.104.0%
Explanation:
(a) Hstd= 75(7.45)/60 = 558.75/60 = 9.313 hr
(b) Ew= 9.313/8.0 = 1.164 = 116.4%
(c) Time worked = 480 – 13 = 467 min
Tc= (467 min)/(75 pc) = 6.227 min/pc
Tn= 7.45/(1 + 0.15) = 6.478 min/pc
Pw= 6.478/6.227 = 1.040 = 104.0%
Answer:
Total estimated bad debts = $9,400
Explanation:
days outstanding A/c Receivable % estimate
0-30 $77,000 1 $770
31-60 $46,000 4 $1,840
61-90 $39,000 5 $1,950
91-120 $23,000 8 $1,840
over 120 $15,000 20 $3,000
Total 200,000 $9,400
Answer:
B. lower than
Explanation:
As orange has a positive externality which cannot be included in the cost, the social optimal will be lower. That's because, neither the consumer will pay to benefit the entire society a higher price than their marginal utility or the producer produce when marginal cost exceed the marginal revenue
The government should try to subsidize the market to allow for a hiher quantity of organge an achieve the socially optinal quantity.
Answer:
The answer is: B) The statement is false. A decrease in the price of digital cameras would decrease the demand for non-digital cameras, but a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would not cause the demand for non-digital cameras to decrease.
Explanation:
Suppose we are not currently living in 2019, instead we are back 12 years to 2007 (before the iPhone). Back then , digital cameras were still used by common "unprofessional" users. Digital cameras were an improvement compared to non-digital cameras, so the price of non-digital cameras were much lower than their digital counterparts.
If the price of digital cameras decreased, then the price of non-digital cameras would decrease also. For example, if luxury car companies like Mercedes Benz started selling sedan cars for $20,000, Ford and Chevrolet would be forced to lower the price of their cars since they wouldn't be able to compete with MB at the same price.
But a decrease in the price of non-digital cameras would never decrease their demand. Something else would have caused that decrease. Probably digital cameras became so cheap that everyone could afford one and since they were so much better than non-digital cameras, people simply stopped buying non-digital cameras.
