The correct interpretation of this case is that antibiotic A is the only one that effectively fights the patient's bacteria.
<h3>How to interpret the results?</h3>
To interpret the results of this case, we must take into account the manifestations that occur with respect to the antibiotic samples A, B, C and D and their reaction with the bacteria in the patient's wound.
According to the above, it can be inferred that antibiotic A eliminated the bacteria, while the other three antibiotics allowed the proliferation of bacteria.
Learn more about antibiotics in: brainly.com/question/10868637
#SPJ1
Answer:
European Immigrants were instead given their own land in land lotteries I believe. Sorry 4 small answer i need to troll :9
Explanation:
In logic, arguments aren't described as true, rather, arguments are used to prove the validity of something.
Answer:
It was a conflict that involved England and Prussia on one side; on the other, France, Austria and Russia. The dispute spans America, Europe and India. In the English colonies of North America it is known as the War against the French and Indians, as armies on both sides involved indigenous tribes in the struggle.
The English victory was sealed with the Treaty of Paris, whereby France ceded Canada, the Ohio Valley and part of the Antilles to the English, but retained Haiti, Guadeloupe and Martinique; for the Spaniards, who assisted the French in America, France delivers the west of Mississippi, while the Spaniards give Florida to the English.
To win the war, British Prime Minister Willian Pitt dumped troops and money on the colonies. As a result, military spending was high; To rebalance the budget, the British impose heavy taxes on American settlers, which is considered to be one of the immediate causes for the start of the United States independence movement.
