Answer: You are trying to find out if the statement is true or false? It is FALSE.
Explanation: Analysts should be concerned with the material movements in the company's financial statements. Although as stated in the question, small changes could amount to material movement but that applies in situations where there is a huge outflow but at the same time, there is similar inflow, so the net effect is negligible on a particular financial statements line item. This instance is not relevant to financial analysts but only the concern of internal control and or internal audit.
Financial analysts are interested in what the key drivers of the financial statements are. These drivers in most cases are an avenue to explain what has transpired in the financials between the current period and the preceding one by way of writing a commentary and providing a succinct and holistic explanation of the financial statements.
It would be time consuming and too operational if analysts are concerned with every percentage movement in the financial statements.
You just add up all the numbers and you get the answer which is 23.60
Answer:
Net Realizablel Value of Account receivable = $142,850
Explanation:
Particulars Amount
Total Accounts Receivable $164,200
- Pre-adjusted Uncollectable Account balance $7,250
- Current Year Uncollectable Amount <u>$14,100 </u> ($235000*6%)
Net Realizable Value <u>$142,850</u>
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
Answer:
The dollar value of ending inventory is $7.500.000
Explanation:
To calculate the dollar value of ending inventory you need to use the next formula:
End inventory= (Beginning inventory + production - sales).$
In this case:
- Beginning inventory: 10.000 units
- January Production: 20.000 units
- Sales: 15.000 units
End inventory= 10000+20000-15000
End inventory= 15.000 units
Dollar value= 150000 . $500= $7.500.000
