1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tangare [24]
3 years ago
10

Why was Jays Treaty criticized?

History
2 answers:
Stolb23 [73]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Jefferson, Madison and other opponents feared the treaty gave too many concessions to the British. They argued that Jay's negotiations actually weakened American trade rights and complained that it committed the U.S. to paying pre-revolutionary debts to English merchants.

Ivenika [448]3 years ago
3 0
....................................
You might be interested in
Giving up one's citizenship and living in another country is called
umka21 [38]
Emigration i think.........
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do Capulet and Tybalt differ in their reactions to Romeo's crashing the feast as a
Evgesh-ka [11]

Capulet does not mind that Romeo is at the party. He says Romeo has a good reputation and he would not want to disturb the good mood of the party. Tybalt thinks Romeo is a scoundrel and has come to the party to mock Capulets.

Capulet:

Content thee, gentle coz. Let him alone. He bears him like a portly gentleman, And, to say truth, Verona brags of him To be a virtuous and well-governed youth. I would not for the wealth of all the town Here in my house do him disparagement. Therefore be patient. Take no note of him. It is my will, the which if thou respect, Show a fair presence and put off these frowns,

7 0
2 years ago
URGENT HURRY PLEASEEE​
Julli [10]
What is it do you need help
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?
Vilka [71]
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How was the government of Mali different from the government of Ghana?​
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

Mali ruled differently from Ghana by having more responsibilities to do, such as governing more people, territory and trade.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The book of life what was the bet between la muerte and xibalba?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of controllable spending? A national parks B Medicare C food stamps D interest on the publi
    14·1 answer
  • What did the Communists change the name of their country to?
    10·1 answer
  • How did George Washington help prevent the national debt from tearing the country apart?
    13·1 answer
  • Initially, they would feel the same shock and dismay
    8·1 answer
  • Which branch can impeach, override a veto, approve treaties and approve judges?
    15·2 answers
  • Based on the map, which of the following is a reasonable conclusion?
    8·2 answers
  • At the heighy of tge Roman Empire, how far did the empire stretch?​
    13·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    11·2 answers
  • What was unusual about the king of england, kaiser of germany, and tsar of russia?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!